In the mystery course I recently taught, we found the ending of Agatha Christie’s A Murder is Announced to be both disconcerting and glorious. There are many wonderful aspects to her writing, but we were most engaged by how she gracefully “undoes” the characters we felt we knew because she had built them so convincingly.
On the flip side, we were slightly less excited about Edgar Allan Poe’s solution to “The Murders in the Rue Morgue”—mostly because there was no character to be undone. Poe’s story is of course important for many reasons, not the least of which is that he is a brilliant writer who is basically creating a new genre by showing us a great mind in action via C. Auguste Dupin. There is much to admire. But still…that ending! Quasi-spoiler alert (which I hope you’ll forgive since the story came out more than a century ago): a human is not responsible.
One of the delicious thrills involved in mystery reading is the opportunity to speculate about people and their motives—but by the time we reach the end, if all goes well, it will be revealed that at least one of our character readings is wrong. And, interestingly, being proven wrong is a desirable rather than frustrating aspect of the experience. You don’t need to read too many reviews of mysteries before you see a pattern: many readers are committed to guessing whodunnit but still want to be surprised by the answer.
The reveal is a disruptive but jubilant mechanism. When the guilty party (or parties) of a traditional mystery becomes apparent, it prompts us to rethink our earlier assumptions. We are catapulted backwards through our reading again, as we correct our impressions in a satisfying way. This, the undoing, is part of our reward…now we see who that character really is and how it all fits together. Success!
Let’s pause for a moment to consider how challenging this is for the writer. It’s a complicated business to craft a character who appears one way but is, secretly, another way. Authors must establish possibilities without drawing attention to them, write toward an ending that provides an inevitable conclusion without giving away what’s to come, and construct a character who could plausibly be responsible for heinous crimes without excessively signaling such capabilities. Delicate balances indeed!
While there are existing methods for writers to complicate our understanding of character and plot (strategies for misdirection, red herrings, and so forth), they are quite difficult to pull off successfully. In truth, there is no tidy formula guaranteed to work….just a creative mind and dedication to developing the intricacies of the story in a way that remains compelling to the reader. It’s almost an impossible task.
Applause and gratitude to writers who manage to surprise us, book after book!
What are the most successful examples of undoings you’ve encountered in your reading? Or what are the things you most struggle with writing such undoings?
Chicks on the Case 
Good points! It IS a challenge, especially book after book, to come up with plots and characters that fool people. And Dame Agatha was the Master (Mistress?). We should all study her more, I think.
LikeLiked by 4 people
She was amazing–though you are great at it too, Kaye!
LikeLike
Agreed, Kaye. And my dream is to surprise readers book after book. It’s a tough task, believe me. Great post!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Me too, Ellen. Have to say, I was surprised by the endings of both your mysteries, so you are *already* living the dream! Woot!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Time after time, I hear writers say they started out thinking one character was going to be the murderer only to come close to the end and have that ah-ha moment and find it’s someone else. Those twists add such excitement and while as a writer I’d like to say they were all planned out, in the end, it’s a mystery. It’s what keepers readers and writers coming back.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Yes, Nancy–agree that it keeps people coming back. Great point. Love when I guess wrong. 🙂
LikeLike
Great post here—and didn’t know you taught “A Murder Is Announced” as well! Just included it on my “Women of Mystery” syllabus last semester, and it was great fun. Look forward to comparing more teaching notes at Malice ahead!
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thanks, Art, and I would love to hear about your class (wish I could have *taken* it, truth be told). Looking forward to comparing notes at Malice.
LikeLike
As a mystery reader, I love it when a writer does that and does it well. My hat is off to them. Honestly, it’s what scares me so much about trying to write a mystery myself. I just don’t think I could pull it off.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Mark, as Nancy said, writers would like to claim all those twists were carefully plotted and planned in advance. But, the truth is, characters often evolve and take on a life of their own, sometimes surprising even the author! And as mystery writers, if we don’t like the direction a character is headed, murder is always an option. 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
Mark, agree completely. When it’s done well, there’s nothing better.
And you could pull it off…I have faith in you. You’re such a thoughtful writer.
LikeLike
Mark, go for it!!!
LikeLike
Great post, Cynthia — I would LOVE to take your mystery course!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Aw, Vickie–that’s so sweet! Would love that. Or…even better…would have you be a guest lecturer!
LikeLiked by 1 person
You can tell you’re an awesome professor!
LikeLiked by 3 people
So nice of you to say that, K! (I’m not, but the students are awesome!)
LikeLiked by 1 person
So Cynthia is an awesome writer, professor, all-round person–and super modest, too!
LikeLike